What is Mike Huckabee Thinking?!

Latest Comments

• Ariz. police officer's Obama photo prompts probe

  Mon Jan 30, 2012
  • Nah, that's ARIZONA. They'll probably offer the guy early retirement, which he'll probably take, and throw him a lavish send-off at a swanky restaurant. That's just how they think over there.

• NBC: Rep. Barney Frank to be married

  Thu Jan 26, 2012
  • Seriously, killerteam. Is that all you've got? Have a nice day, PATRIOT!

• NBC: Rep. Barney Frank to be married

  Thu Jan 26, 2012
  • killerteam, I wish for you what you wish for Barney. Have a nice day, PATRIOT!

• Ship carrying rocket parts, hits Kentucky bridge

  Fri Jan 27, 2012
  • Katcando: This probably won't change Rand Paul's mind or anyone else's because no one died. Unfortunately it'll take a much more spectacular collapse with a high death toll to get some of these "decision-makers" to take notice.

• Ship carrying rocket parts, hits Kentucky bridge

  Fri Jan 27, 2012
  • Ahoov123: +1 (from a bridge designer)

• NBC: Rep. Barney Frank to be married

  Thu Jan 26, 2012
  • Actually, I do work and I am happy with this President who I don't happen to think is an idiot. It's interesting that you start out your rant by making assumptions about me that you can't possibly back up.

• Wrecked cruise ship passengers offered $14,460 plus travel, medical costs

  Fri Jan 27, 2012
  • $14K doesn't buy a whole lot of therapy...

• NBC: Rep. Barney Frank to be married

  Thu Jan 26, 2012
  • Boy, who were all these "Obama men" before Obama came along? Why, you'd almost believe that Barack Obama singlehandedly caused all of our country's current problems.

• NBC: Rep. Barney Frank to be married

  Thu Jan 26, 2012
  • It galls me a lot more that a congressman can "retire" and get those privileges in the first place. It's not meant to be a "career."

• NBC: Rep. Barney Frank to be married

  Thu Jan 26, 2012
  • A fact based on what, Stephen? Scripture? If that's your basis, then athiests cannot "marry," and Newt Gingrich's marriage would also be invalid according to Mark 10. Your assertion is no more "fact" than the one you're arguing against.